Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono-Red Aggro | alessandro_cecconi | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | ozawa naoya | 9-3 | None |
Izzet Prowess | luís felippe rossello lima | 8-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | matteo soldi | 6-2 | None |
Boros Burn , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Delirium , Izzet Cauldron , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Soul Sear ranks #3042 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 59%).
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Soul Sear is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 6.13 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Soul Sear has a win rate of 55.2%, making it 16.3% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Binding Negotiation | Sorcery | 5 | 69.3% | 0 |
Urza's Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 9 | 67.9% | 1 |
Parting Gust | Instant | 9 | 67.9% | 1 |
Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 7 | 64.8% | 0 |
Exorcise | Sorcery | 10 | 63.7% | 1 |
Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 61.8% | 0 |
Ancient Vendetta | Sorcery | 11 | 59.9% | 1 |
Kaya, Intangible Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaya | 13 | 58.5% | 2 |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 16 | 56.3% | 2 |
Legions to Ashes | Sorcery | 17 | 55.6% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Soul Sear than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mystical Dispute | Instant | 3 | 6 | 70.6% | 55.7% | +14.9% |
Essence Scatter | Instant | 2 | 6 | 73.2% | 58.4% | +14.8% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 6 | 70.6% | 55.9% | +14.7% |
Shark Typhoon | Enchantment | 6 | 6 | 70.6% | 56.4% | +14.2% |
Brazen Borrower | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 3 | 5 | 66.7% | 55.8% | +10.9% |
Goldspan Dragon | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 7 | 68.0% | 57.1% | +10.9% |
Storm's Wrath | Sorcery | 4 | 7 | 63.2% | 57.5% | +5.7% |
Shatterskull Smashing | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 61.1% | 56.4% | +4.8% |
Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 2 | 9 | 59.0% | 56.9% | +2.1% |
Ox of Agonas | Creature — Ox | 5 | 12 | 59.3% | 57.7% | +1.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono-Red Aggro | 15 | 3.5% | 29.7% |
Orzhov Control | 11 | 42.3% | 51.0% |
Izzet Prowess | 7 | 0.7% | 42.5% |
Unknown Archetype | 4 | 1.1% | 58.0% |
Esper Control | 2 | 25.0% | 50.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.